Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran US Relations results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 467 hits . Analysis detected 3,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (11,002 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran US Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Iran US Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 2,520
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.7% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Red Herring: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 0.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst