Keyword summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran U S Relations results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 263 hits . Analysis detected 1,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,203 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,475 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran U S Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group. Iran U S Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 1,203
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.8% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 21.9% 21.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst