Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Tanker Attacks Raise Strait Of Hormuz Threat To Severe results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 165 hits . Analysis detected 1,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (13,308 of 34,753 keywords). This Iran Tanker Attacks Raise Strait Of Hormuz Threat To Severe is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Iran Tanker Attacks Raise Strait Of Hormuz Threat To Severe
Keyword details
Total words: 1,928
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.7% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst