Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Tanker Attacks Raise Strait Of Hormuz Threat To Severe results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 1,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (13,308 of 34,753 keywords). This Iran Tanker Attacks Raise Strait Of Hormuz Threat To Severe is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Iran Tanker Attacks Raise Strait Of Hormuz Threat To Severe
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,928
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos