Keyword summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Japan Relations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 4,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,096 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,761 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group.
Iran Japan Relations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Iran Japan Relations (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,096
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510082.0% percentile
5.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 22.9%22.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate