Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Israel US March 13 Oil Prices results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.9% saturation with 2,473 hits. Analysis detected 7,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,590 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 89% (3,844 of 34,587 keywords). This Iran Israel US March 13 Oil Prices is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Iran Israel US March 13 Oil Prices
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
89%Iran Israel US March 13 Oil Prices (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,590
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 53.9%53.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 26.6%26.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 53.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos