Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investment Accounts results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 1,040 hits. Analysis detected 5,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,940 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,331 of 37,536 keywords). This Investment Accounts is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Investment Accounts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%Investment Accounts (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,940
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 26.4%26.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 26.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate