Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,263 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Invertebrates results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 488 hits . Analysis detected 2,866 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,052 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,896 of 37,536 keywords). This Invertebrates is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Invertebrates
Keyword details
Total words: 5,052
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst