Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,934 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interview-With-The-Vampire results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,592 hits . Analysis detected 10,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,748 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (24,053 of 35,814 keywords). This Interview-With-The-Vampire is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. Interview-With-The-Vampire
Keyword details
Total words: 11,748
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.1% 22.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst