Keyword summary
42%1 analyzed article/video447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Internet Trend results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Bandwagon, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 1,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,341 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,384 of 37,536 keywords). This Internet Trend is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Internet Trend
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Internet Trend (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,341
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos