Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Troops results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.6% saturation with 2,205 hits. Analysis detected 6,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,457 of 37,536 keywords). This International Troops is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
International Troops
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
78%International Troops (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,111
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510077.5% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 53.6%53.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 53.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos