Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Energy Agency results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Recency Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 474 hits. Analysis detected 2,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (24,442 of 37,536 keywords). This International Energy Agency is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
International Energy Agency
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,544
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510034.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos