Keyword summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos1,424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Emergency Economic Powers Act results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 1,145 hits. Analysis detected 7,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,272 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (10,193 of 37,536 keywords). This International Emergency Economic Powers Act is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,272
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 26.8%26.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.4%6.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos