Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Interfaith Leaders results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 515 hits. Analysis detected 2,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Interfaith Leaders is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Interfaith Leaders
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Interfaith Leaders (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos