Keyword summary
69% 1 analyzed article/video 2,505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intakes results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 853 hits . Analysis detected 4,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,359 of 37,536 keywords). This Intakes is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group. Intakes
Keyword details
Total words: 7,515
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst