Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Instructure results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 895 hits. Analysis detected 3,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,920 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (20,067 of 35,316 keywords). This Instructure is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Instructure
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
44%Instructure (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,920
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate