Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Inspectors results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 3,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 35,068 keywords). This Inspectors is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Inspectors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Inspectors (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos