Keyword summary
91%2 analyzed articles/videos894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indira Talwani results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 642 hits. Analysis detected 3,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,682 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,187 of 35,596 keywords). This Indira Talwani is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Indira Talwani
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
80%Indira Talwani (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,682
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
5.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 21.2%21.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 23.9%23.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos