Keyword summary
88%1 analyzed article/video2,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indentured Servitude results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,045 hits. Analysis detected 8,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,149 of 37,536 keywords). This Indentured Servitude is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Indentured Servitude
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%Indentured Servitude (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.1%15.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Serfdom, Republican-style74%
UnHerd69%By Michael Lind67%7/22/2026, 11:00:37 PM