Keyword summary
74%1 analyzed article/video668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indentured Servants results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 467 hits. Analysis detected 1,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,924 of 37,536 keywords). This Indentured Servants is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Indentured Servants
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Indentured Servants (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,004
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510068.2% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos