Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Income Offsets results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 1,586 hits. Analysis detected 6,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,443 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Income Offsets is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Income Offsets
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Income Offsets (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,443
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 21.1%21.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos