Keyword summary
40%1 analyzed article/video913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These In The Mouth Of Madness results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 1,239 hits. Analysis detected 4,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,312 of 37,536 keywords). This In The Mouth Of Madness is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
In The Mouth Of Madness
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%In The Mouth Of Madness (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 33.9%33.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos