Keyword summary
25% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impressionism results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 2,405 hits . Analysis detected 9,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,169 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,827 of 37,536 keywords). This Impressionism is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Impressionism
Keyword details
Total words: 11,169
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.5% 21.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst