Keyword summary
58% 9 analyzed articles/videos 890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Imperial Family results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 1,200 hits . Analysis detected 7,180 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,336 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,193 of 37,304 keywords). This Imperial Family is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Imperial Family
Keyword details
Total words: 6,336
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst