Keyword summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impact Fees results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 159 hits . Analysis detected 1,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,170 of 36,733 keywords). This Impact Fees is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Impact Fees
Keyword details
Total words: 1,336
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.9% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Red Herring: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst