Keyword summary
68%2 analyzed articles/videos665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration Fraud results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 605 hits. Analysis detected 4,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,176 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,223 of 37,536 keywords). This Immigration Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Immigration Fraud
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%Immigration Fraud (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,176
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.4%14.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos