Keyword summary
66%1 analyzed article/video572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigrant Protections results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 1,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (12,796 of 35,936 keywords). This Immigrant Protections is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Immigrant Protections
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
65%Immigrant Protections (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos