Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Iman Vellani results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 54 hits . Analysis detected 325 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,098 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Iman Vellani is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Iman Vellani
Keyword details
Total words: 1,098
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst