Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Illinois State Board Of Elections results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 223 hits. Analysis detected 1,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Illinois State Board Of Elections is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Illinois State Board Of Elections
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos