Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illinois Redistricting results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 251 hits . Analysis detected 2,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,640 of 37,536 keywords). This Illinois Redistricting is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group. Illinois Redistricting
Keyword details
Total words: 3,832
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst