Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illinois Environmental Protection Agency results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 979 hits. Analysis detected 9,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,312 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (20,726 of 37,536 keywords). This Illinois Environmental Protection Agency is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 9,312
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos