Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illinois Elections results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 608 hits . Analysis detected 5,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,940 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,855 of 37,533 keywords). This Illinois Elections is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Illinois Elections
Keyword details
Total words: 6,940
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst