Keyword summary
57% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Raid results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 1,510 hits . Analysis detected 7,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,182 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,296 of 37,536 keywords). This Ice Raid is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Ice Raid
Keyword details
Total words: 6,182
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst