Keyword summary
36% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hypercar results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,029 hits . Analysis detected 6,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,887 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (23,710 of 36,715 keywords). This Hypercar is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Hypercar
Keyword details
Total words: 7,887
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst