Keyword summary
73%1 analyzed article/video586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hydrogenolysis results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 1,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,758 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,151 of 36,716 keywords). This Hydrogenolysis is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Hydrogenolysis
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
70%Hydrogenolysis (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,758
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510069.6% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos