Keyword summary
70% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hybrid Work results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 1,058 hits . Analysis detected 7,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,128 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (19,590 of 34,665 keywords). This Hybrid Work is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Hybrid Work
Keyword details
Total words: 7,128
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst