Keyword summary
77% 1 analyzed article/video 691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunter Gatherers results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 374 hits . Analysis detected 2,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,073 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (13,646 of 34,637 keywords). This Hunter Gatherers is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Hunter Gatherers
Keyword details
Total words: 2,073
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst