Keyword summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunger Strikers results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 717 hits . Analysis detected 3,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 80% (11,609 of 58,038 keywords). This Hunger Strikers is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group. Hunger Strikers
Keyword details
Total words: 2,832
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.0% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.3% 25.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst