Keyword summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humboldt County Superior Court results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 406 hits. Analysis detected 1,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (3,672 of 37,536 keywords). This Humboldt County Superior Court is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Humboldt County Superior Court
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

90% percentile
025507510090.2% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.8%30.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 24.9%24.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 14.1%14.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos