Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humboldt Broncos Bus Crash results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 662 hits. Analysis detected 2,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (27,444 of 34,563 keywords). This Humboldt Broncos Bus Crash is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Humboldt Broncos Bus Crash
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
21%Humboldt Broncos Bus Crash (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510020.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos