Keyword summary
68%3 analyzed articles/videos4,309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humans First results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 907 hits. Analysis detected 11,945 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,927 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,959 of 37,536 keywords). This Humans First is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Humans First
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
21%Humans First (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,927
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate