Keyword summary
44%2 analyzed articles/videos2,263 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Center results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 884 hits. Analysis detected 5,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,052 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (43,156 of 56,181 keywords). This Human Rights Center is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Human Rights Center
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
24%Human Rights Center (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,052
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate