Keyword summary
96%2 analyzed articles/videos1,519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights And International Courts results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 1,823 hits. Analysis detected 9,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,283 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,991 of 37,536 keywords). This Human Rights And International Courts is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Human Rights And International Courts
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,283
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 34.5%34.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 34.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos