Keyword summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights And International Courts results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 1,823 hits . Analysis detected 9,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,283 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,991 of 37,536 keywords). This Human Rights And International Courts is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Human Rights And International Courts
Keyword details
Total words: 5,283
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 34.5% 34.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 34.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Straw Man: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst