Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hugh Grant results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 460 hits . Analysis detected 3,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,644 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,738 of 37,536 keywords). This Hugh Grant is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Hugh Grant
Keyword details
Total words: 5,644
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst