Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hoyte Van Hoytema results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 943 hits. Analysis detected 4,762 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,889 keywords). This Hoyte Van Hoytema is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hoyte Van Hoytema
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Hoyte Van Hoytema (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos