Keyword summary
63% 7 analyzed articles/videos 8,474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houthi Rebels results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 3,058 hits . Analysis detected 22,563 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,483 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (35,669 of 37,530 keywords). This Houthi Rebels is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group. Houthi Rebels
Keyword details
Total words: 35,483
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles35.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst