Keyword summary
â 94% 1 analyzed article/video 823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Shooting results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 680 hits . Analysis detected 3,287 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,469 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of â 70% (11,434 of 37,536 keywords). This Houston Shooting is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Houston Shooting
Keyword details
Total words: 2,469
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.5% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 27.5% 27.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst