Keyword summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Parks results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Anchoring Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 106 hits . Analysis detected 906 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,038 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,146 of 37,533 keywords). This Houston Parks is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Houston Parks
Keyword details
Total words: 1,038
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst