Keyword summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video1,139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Isd results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 1,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,417 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (31,042 of 37,536 keywords). This Houston Isd is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Houston Isd
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠18%Houston Isd (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,417
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos