Keyword summary
31% 1 analyzed article/video 109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Fire Departmet results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 29 hits . Analysis detected 189 faulty-reasoning hits from 436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (8,407 of 56,739 keywords). This Houston Fire Departmet is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. Houston Fire Departmet
Keyword details
Total words: 436
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.2% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles436 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst