Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Cantwell results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 546 hits . Analysis detected 3,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,310 of 37,536 keywords). This Houston Cantwell is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Houston Cantwell
Keyword details
Total words: 3,700
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst